He is a twenty-one-year veteran of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, who started at the bottom of the T. In Houston, Martin has won the respect of at least two prisoners.
Democrats, who have found themselves on the losing end of the national security debate the past two national elections, said the changes to the [Bush Administration's executive detention and military commissions] bill had not yet reached a level that would cause them to try to block it altogether.
We want to do it in compliance with the Constitution. I am puzzled by and ashamed of the Democrats' moral cowardice on this bill. The latest version of the bill blesses detainee abuse and looks the other way on forms of detainee torture; it immunizes terrible acts; it abridges the writ of habeas corpus-- in the last, most egregious draft, it strips the writ for alleged enemy combatants whether proved to be so or not, whether citizens or not, and whether found in the U.
This bill is simply outrageous. I doubt whether many Democratic Senators or staffs have read the bill or understand what is in it. Instead, they seem to be scrambling over themselves to vote for it out of a fear that the American public will think them weak and soft on terror.
The reason why the Democrats have not been doing very well on these issues, however, is that the public does not believe that they stand for anything other than echoing what the Republicans have been doing with a bit less conviction.
Yeah, I guess so.
|Gorsuch’s Soft Style and Hard Line – Consortiumnews||Khadr pled guilty to all charges and will get at least one year more at Gitmo — in solitary — then perhaps be transferred to Canada for a remaining seven years. This was one of the radical policies of George W.|
|Care2 Group Discussions Help||Mike Johnston's first hint that something unusual was happening at Camp Zoe was the presence of four police officers at Tiffany Hall, the campground's dining area.|
|Constitutional Essays: Examples, Topics, Titles, & Outlines | Page 10||The main focus of its campaigning is to:|
|Report Abuse||How extraordinary, then, to learn that one of the perpetrators of these crimes, Condoleezza Rice, has just led the debate in a special session of the United Nations Security Council on the use of sexual violence as a weapon of war.|
The Democrats may think that if they let this pass, they are guaranteed to pick up more seats in the House and Senate. But they will actually win less seats this way.
For they will have proved to the American people that they are spineless and opportunistic-- that, when faced with a genuine choice and a genuine challenge, they can keep neither our country nor our values safe. The current bill, if passed, will give the Executive far more dictatorial powers to detain, prosecute, judge and punish than it ever enjoyed before.
Over the last 48 hours, it has been modified in a hundred different ways to increase executive power at the expense of judicial review, due process, and oversight.
And what is more, the bill's most outrageous provisions on torture, definition of enemy combatants, secret procedures, and habeas stripping, are completely unnecessary to keep Americans safe. Rather, they are the work of an Executive branch that has proven itself as untrustworthy as it is greedy: If the Democrats do not stand up to the President on this bill, if they refuse to filibuster it or even threaten to filibuster it, they do not deserve to win any additional seats in the House or in the Senate.
They will have delivered a grievous blow to our system of checks and balances, stained America's reputation around the world, and allowed an obscenity to disfigure the American system of law and justice.
Far worse than a misguided zealot is the moral coward who says nothing and allows that zealotry to do real harm.Florida the Supreme Court decided that juveniles can get life without parole a court-martialed detainee No doubt.” Vandeveld, who now heads the public defender office in Erie.
The problem, as the essay retraces, comes from reading together the Supreme Court's decisions in Ex parte Bollman () and Tarble's Case (), the former of which precluded common-law habeas. Jun 20, · The Supreme Court this morning denied cert in the Guantanamo habeas case of Hussain v.
Obama. A few weeks back, Marty Lederman flagged this case over the Just Security as likely to provoke at least one justice to write a dissenting or concurring statement in connection with the denial of cert.
Marty nailed it. The Supreme Court decided that the character of a belligerent is question to be decided by the President. The court found the executive branch is the political department in which this power has been entrusted and that it’s in the President’s power to determine what degree a crisis demands.
sheela barse v state of maharashtra scc 96 Sheela Barse – a journalist and activist for prisonersí rights – wrote to the Supreme Court saying that of the 15 women prisoners interviewed by her in Bombay Central Jail, five admitted that they had been assaulted in police lock-up.
Moreover, the Supreme Court has yet to settle definitively the first and perhaps most fundamental due process question of all: habeas corpus. This fall, for the third time, the justices will.