An analysis of moral dilemma utilitarianism

Bowenpp. Objective autonomy For the public relations professional, the state of equally considering the merits of all arguments, both from various publics and the organization.

An analysis of moral dilemma utilitarianism

It gives us a clear notion of the duties of public servants, and private administrators with regards to ethical decision they face in the daily execution of duties in communities they represent.

In this analysis, I will explore the ethical and moral values of the main characters in the movie in performing their various official capacities.

I will also elaborate on health insurance coverage by defining and reviewing the difference and similarities of PPO and HMO. First of all let me explain what the movie is about before touching on the moral and ethical dilemmas of the characters.

The director of this movie Nick Cassavetes reveals a social issue in the health care industry. He explains the ordeals of John Archibald, whose son has a serious cardiac condition that requires urgent surgery.

John did not have an appropriate health insurance policy to cover the cost of the operation; the hospital chooses not to take the Good Samaritan route, and refuse to proceed with the operation.

John decided to take the hospital staff and other patients at the emergency room hostage. In the Geuras, Dean, and Charles Garoralo text for this course have discussed the four sub groups of absolutism which will be discussed in this analysis. It talks about philosophers like Aristotle, Kant, and Mills who have developed their ethical opinions and philosophies.

By reviewing events throughout the movie, we can compare them as to how they would be viewed under these different philosophies to determine if they were morally right, or wrong in relation to Public Administration. One would wonder why a hospital will refuse to offer free operation to save the life of a twelve year old boy.

A world of budget, deadlines to meet, accountability, and compliance Garofalo and Gueras p, 1. Utilitarian believes that the outcome of any action has to be for the happiness of many.

One outcome emphasizes his desire to find a heart for his son while the other saves the lives of hostages and expose his weakness. In the end, he shows his reverence for humanity and releases the hostages that need serious help to save them.

An analysis of moral dilemma utilitarianism

By releasing the most vulnerable patients during the hostage negotiation for their own good, divulge a good side of John. John Q may have portray a poor character traits for using the gun to commandeer the hospital staff, but for the very fact that he was brandishing an empty gun on his victims, and his consistency in freeing hostages as promise, is a clear indication of being a man of integrity.

Since virtual theory is concern with the significance of the whole person, Garofalo and Gueras p, His case brings awareness to his community who can relate to its plight, of part time employment, and lack of health insurance. Is welcome by sympathizers, and that is a remuneration for his virtues.

Furthermore, the movie also brings to mind the question of loyalty which is one of the six pillars of characters. How much can one be loyal to his employer or organization?

One of the ER male nurses reveals that HMO physicians receives annual Christmas bonus for not checking their patients for costly illness to avoid paying hospitals for costly procedures. The heart surgeon amongst the hostage is reluctant in accepting this claim which I think is the exercise of his loyalty to the hospital.Free utilitarianism papers, essays, and research papers.

An analysis of moral dilemma utilitarianism

Utilitarianism: The Greatest Happiness Principle - Utilitarianism was first brought up along the nourishing of “The Greatest Happiness Principle” introduced by Jeremy Bentham and further developed by John Stuart Mill, who was a .

I think it’s the same phenomenon wherein people become outraged at the prospect of trading-off sacred values for mundane ones. I think the perceived immorality of this comes because it breaks the moral principle of not taking advantage of people’s misery.

Workplace Example of Utilitarianism Ethics The core idea of utilitarianism is that an action is right if it results in the happiness of the greatest number of people in a society or a group. In the workplace, the idea of this concept is if you conduct yourself properly at work, then you will be able to achieve professional happiness.

The case study presents a moral dilemma based on potential harm to innocent people. By using Kohlberg’s moral development model and by examining major ethical systems, namely deontology and utilitarianism, a clear understanding of the factors influencing this . Involving others in our moral decision making means that these others can provide insight or experience which is different from our own.

The second way in which we can learn from discussing moral questions with others is a long-term gain in moral understanding. The Colbert Election Experience: Bob Bauer comments on the short-lived Colbert campaign for President at More Soft Money Hard ashio-midori.com post begins: So the South Carolina Democratic party has concluded that Stephen Colbert may not appear on the Democratic primary ballot.

The Philosophy of Batman - Overthinking It